If the argument, name is given with NULL, it would be probably unexpected behavior. It should fail rather than register the NULL-named parameter. If strdup() fails with out-of-memory, it should also fail with -ENOMEM. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes in v2: - Fix the condition of returning -ENOMEM lib/parameter.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/parameter.c b/lib/parameter.c index 71262c4..02a89bb 100644 --- a/lib/parameter.c +++ b/lib/parameter.c @@ -130,6 +130,13 @@ static int __dev_add_param(struct param_d *param, struct device_d *dev, const ch if (get_param_by_name(dev, name)) return -EEXIST; + if (!name) + return -EINVAL; + + param->name = strdup(name); + if (!param->name) + return -ENOMEM; + if (set) param->set = set; else @@ -139,7 +146,6 @@ static int __dev_add_param(struct param_d *param, struct device_d *dev, const ch else param->get = param_get_generic; - param->name = strdup(name); param->flags = flags; param->dev = dev; list_add_tail(¶m->list, &dev->parameters); -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox