I'm not sure where a negative timeout could come from but making the code more robust for no additional runtime cost is good nevertheless. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c b/drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c index 31c3d0d85353..66e9f6848f74 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c +++ b/drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int imx21_watchdog_set_timeout(struct imx_wd *priv, int timeout) dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: %d\n", __func__, timeout); - if (!timeout || timeout > 128) + if (timeout <= 0 || timeout > 128) return -EINVAL; if (timeout > 0) -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox