> On Jan 23, 2015, at 4:04 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:53:48PM +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >>> On Jan 23, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 03:26:53PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: >>>> On the SAMA5D35 the EMAC phy addr is 1 while not 0. So, let >>>> the EMAC auto detect phy addr, or else hard code to 0, the >>>> ethernet can not work on SAMA5D35 board. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> There ere boards with different phy addresses around, so >>> the current state does not work on all boards anyway. So the worst >>> thing that can happen with this and the other patch for the gmac is >>> that now another set of boards does not work. Let's give it a try. >>> I'm open to reports when now some board stops working. >>> >>> Applied this and the gmac patch. >> >> except we can auto detect the board we are running from >> so it will be better to specify it at Run time >> >> as we have issue on auto detect on some of them > > Ok, so your suggestion is to detect the board (type, revision?) and > set phy_addr correctly based on this information, right? Fine with me > aswell. Is it known which boards have which phy_addr? yes and I already write the detection code in barebox Best Regards, J. > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
