On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 09:33:02AM +0200, Juergen Borleis wrote: > Hi Uwe, > > On Thursday 31 July 2014 09:14:25 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > [...] > > Compared with storing the default environment in the external store the > > only difference is that you don't need to modify it if you change the > > internal one, right? > > This would also be an advantage of this new feature. The only one even? > > I wonder what the targeted use case is. > > To use an external stored environment *only* for development purposes or tests > and to keep the possibility to do so. Doesn't make a warm and cosy feeling. Isn't it easier and more robust to just not tell barebox about the external storage at all and for the testing/development procedure do an explicit loadenv /dev/tralala ? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
