Hi Raphaël,
Looks mostly fine to me. Two small comments:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:09:04PM -0700, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
> +
> +static int at91_twi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> +{
> + struct at91_twi_dev *i2c_at91;
> + struct at91_twi_pdata *i2c_data;
> + int rc;
> + u32 bus_clk_rate;
> +
> + i2c_at91 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct at91_twi_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!i2c_at91) {
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free;
> + }
You can safely use xzalloc here and skip the result check.
> +
> + rc = dev_get_drvdata(dev, (unsigned long *)&i2c_data);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + i2c_at91->pdata = i2c_data;
> +
> + i2c_at91->base = dev_request_mem_region(dev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(i2c_at91->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(i2c_at91->base);
dev_request_mem_region returns NULL on error, not an error pointer.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
