On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:29:23 +0200
Clément Léger <clement.leger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +int
> > +pci_read_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 where, u8 *val)
> > +{
> > + return pci_bus_read_config_byte(dev->bus, dev->devfn, where, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +pci_read_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 where, u16 *val)
> > +{
> > + return pci_bus_read_config_word(dev->bus, dev->devfn, where, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +pci_read_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 where, u32 *val)
> > +{
> > + return pci_bus_read_config_dword(dev->bus, dev->devfn, where, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +pci_write_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 where, u8 val)
> > +{
> > + return pci_bus_write_config_byte(dev->bus, dev->devfn, where, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +pci_write_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 where, u16 val)
> > +{
> > + return pci_bus_write_config_word(dev->bus, dev->devfn, where, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +pci_write_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 where, u32 val)
> > +{
> > + return pci_bus_write_config_dword(dev->bus, dev->devfn, where, val);
> > +}
> >
> I would suggest replacing the "u8 where" (in pci_read/write_config and
> others) by "int where" to allow future access to PCIe extended
> configuration space (up to offset 0x1000).
Already done in [RFC v4] patchseries!
--
Best regards,
Antony Pavlov
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
