Hi,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 04:09:17PM +0200, Christian Hemp wrote:
> For some phyFLEX-i.MX6 modules the call __barebox_arm_head() was not removed.
> With this function the barebox does not start.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp <christian.hemp@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boards/phytec-phyflex-imx6/lowlevel.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phyflex-imx6/lowlevel.c b/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phyflex-imx6/lowlevel.c
> index 6c6f660..4350adb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phyflex-imx6/lowlevel.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phyflex-imx6/lowlevel.c
> @@ -93,8 +93,6 @@ ENTRY_FUNCTION(start_phytec_pbab01_4gib, r0, r1, r2)
> {
> void *fdt;
>
> - __barebox_arm_head();
> -
> arm_cpu_lowlevel_init();
>
> arm_setup_stack(0x00920000 - 8);
> @@ -108,8 +106,6 @@ ENTRY_FUNCTION(start_phytec_pbab01dl_1gib, r0, r1, r2)
> {
> void *fdt;
>
> - __barebox_arm_head();
> -
> arm_cpu_lowlevel_init();
>
> arm_setup_stack(0x00920000 - 8);
In this function is also some spaces instead tabs.
- Alex
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
