On Thu, 8 May 2014 14:43:15 +0200 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14:29 Mon 05 May , Alessandro Rubini wrote: > > > > > The most notable is lwIP (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/). > > > > I'm not happy at all about this code base, it looks quite ugly and > > old-fashioned. It's not the barebox kind of quality. I'd stay with the > > current code rather than lwip, despite the number of users. > > > > If any, I'd evaluate picotcp (https://github.com/tass-belgium/picotcp). > > uIP too Hmm, uIP looks like a light version of lwip or have I missed something? > > Best Regards, > J. > > > > /alessandro > > > > _______________________________________________ > > barebox mailing list > > barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox -- -- Best regards, Antony Pavlov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
