On Mon, 5 May 2014 14:29:44 +0200 Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The most notable is lwIP (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/). > > I'm not happy at all about this code base, it looks quite ugly and > old-fashioned. It's not the barebox kind of quality. I'd stay with the > current code rather than lwip, despite the number of users. > > If any, I'd evaluate picotcp (https://github.com/tass-belgium/picotcp). Thanks for very interesting picotcp link! At a glance picotcp looks better than lwip. -- Best regards, Antony Pavlov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
