On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 08:08:09AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 08:40:49AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > Crash can be caused if xzalloc() for "numstack" fails. > > xzalloc doesn't fail. > Some little offtopic to this issue: I am falling sometimes in the same trap and then it reminds me "xzalloc will occur a panic when internal malloc fails". In the world of barebox we need to think a little bit different than in the world of linux. But this is actually a behaviour what we don't want, we want to think in linux way, when you programming barebox. On the other hand, bootloader is a bootloader and need little code and this reduce a many error branches of barebox so "xzalloc" is just a great idea. I want to mention that, Alexander is not alone. :-) ...maybe some codestyle checkers will detected this as a missing error handling. - Alex _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
