On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 09:10 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > + Grant Likely, Ian Campbell, devicetree ML > > This discussion started on the barebox bootloader mailinglist > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:13:32AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > It's becoming more obvious that devicetree maintenance is painful > > because we have to sync them to the kernel regularly. My hope was that > > this would get simpler once the devicetrees get their own repository > > outside the kernel, but it seems that won't happen anytime soon. > > hmm. Ian Campbell has a tree he is working on: > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/device-tree-rebasing.git This is automatically extracted out of the linux git tree (using git-filter-branch), maintaining all the history etc. I intend to keep this running until such a time as the DTS files are migrated out of Linux. For the time being though patches to this tree need to go through the Linux tree in the normal way. (also, as the name states it is potentially rebasing, although there hasn't been an actual need since the early days when I was still getting things working) Ian. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
