On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:48:19AM +0100, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Le Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:40:44 +0400,
> Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> > Понедельник, 10 февраля 2014, 9:33 +01:00 от Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:26:41PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > Суббота, 8 февраля 2014, 15:16 +01:00 от Eric Bénard <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > > > index 678547c..91659b8 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > > > @@ -75,6 +75,15 @@
> > > > > interrupt-parent = <&tzic>;
> > > > > ranges;
> > > > >
> > > > > + sata: sata@10000000 {
> > > > > + compatible = "fsl,imx53-ahci";
> > > > > + reg = <0x10000000 0x1000>;
> > > > > + interrupts = <28>;
> > > > > + clocks = <&clks 173>, <&clks 5>, <&clks 188>;
> > > > > + clock-names = "sata", "ahb", "per";
> > > > > + status = "disabled";
> > > > > + };
> > > >
> > > > Sascha, we stop changing DTS of the kernel or not?
> > > > What is the ultimate solution?
> > >
> > > What do you suggest for the case above? A imx53-bb.dtsi included from
> > > imx53.dtsi? I think disallowing ahci support for barebox if it's not
> > > upstream in Linux is not a good option.
> >
> > I suggest just sync imx53.dtsi from the linux-next, as a result we will have
> > non-modified version of kernel templates.
> > Change as above, makes imx53.dtsi different for kernel and barebox.
> > This is part of sata node from the kernel:
> > sata: sata@10000000 {
> > compatible = "fsl,imx53-ahci";
> > reg = <0x10000000 0x1000>;
> > interrupts = <28>;
> > clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_SATA_GATE>,
> > <&clks IMX5_CLK_SATA_REF>,
> > <&clks IMX5_CLK_AHB>;
> > clock-names = "sata_gate", "sata_ref", "ahb";
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> that's possible, I don't know why the clock are changed in barebox vs
> linux and don't know if that's needed (I got inspiration from other
> nodes)
They are identical, it's only that Alexander introduced defines for the
clocks in Linux whereas in barebox we have the older versions with
plain numbers.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
