Le Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:33:58 +0100,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:26:41PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Суббота, 8 февраля 2014, 15:16 +01:00 от Eric Bénard <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > index 678547c..91659b8 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi
> > > @@ -75,6 +75,15 @@
> > > interrupt-parent = <&tzic>;
> > > ranges;
> > >
> > > + sata: sata@10000000 {
> > > + compatible = "fsl,imx53-ahci";
> > > + reg = <0x10000000 0x1000>;
> > > + interrupts = <28>;
> > > + clocks = <&clks 173>, <&clks 5>, <&clks 188>;
> > > + clock-names = "sata", "ahb", "per";
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > + };
> >
> > Sascha, we stop changing DTS of the kernel or not?
> > What is the ultimate solution?
>
> What do you suggest for the case above? A imx53-bb.dtsi included from
> imx53.dtsi? I think disallowing ahci support for barebox if it's not
> upstream in Linux is not a good option.
>
it's in linux-next :
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi#n94
Eric
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
