Simply do the same as barebox and hope for the best as u-boot does not handle
runtime address detection for boot quite often. It does only execpt you to
choose as compiling time.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/lib/bootm.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/bootm.c b/arch/arm/lib/bootm.c
index 599b09a..71200be 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/bootm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/bootm.c
@@ -315,6 +315,12 @@ static struct image_handler barebox_handler = {
.filetype = filetype_arm_barebox,
};
+static struct image_handler uboot_handler = {
+ .name = "ARM u-boot",
+ .bootm = do_bootm_barebox,
+ .filetype = filetype_arm_uboot,
+};
+
#include <aimage.h>
static int aimage_load_resource(int fd, struct resource *r, void* buf, int ps)
@@ -470,9 +476,15 @@ static struct binfmt_hook binfmt_barebox_hook = {
.exec = "bootm",
};
+static struct binfmt_hook binfmt_uboot_hook = {
+ .type = filetype_arm_uboot,
+ .exec = "bootm",
+};
+
static int armlinux_register_image_handler(void)
{
register_image_handler(&barebox_handler);
+ register_image_handler(&uboot_handler);
register_image_handler(&uimage_handler);
register_image_handler(&rawimage_handler);
register_image_handler(&zimage_handler);
@@ -482,6 +494,7 @@ static int armlinux_register_image_handler(void)
}
binfmt_register(&binfmt_arm_zimage_hook);
binfmt_register(&binfmt_barebox_hook);
+ binfmt_register(&binfmt_uboot_hook);
return 0;
}
--
1.8.4.rc1
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
