On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:06:57PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 09:30 Fri 07 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 07:52:49AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 12:16 Thu 06 Dec , Fabio Porcedda wrote: > > > > This is to have a nicely ordered list and to decrease the > > > > likelihood of a conflict when adding a new board. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > v2: > > > NAK > > > > > > I order them by Kconfig keepo it that way > > > > I'd say it makes more sense to keep them in the order the user actually > > sees them, it makes it easier to find the entries. What's the value in > > ordering them by Kconfig name? > > If you order them by Kconfig name, the Calao boards end up in three > > different places in the user visible view. > > I do it the same we do on the kernel > and I do want to keep that way the board are order by Kconfig 'keep' the way implies that they are ordered, they are not. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
