On 13:04 Wed 14 Nov , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:34:58AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 09:05 Wed 14 Nov , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:14:05PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > >
> > > > int phy_update_status(struct phy_device *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -35,11 +54,18 @@ int phy_update_status(struct phy_device *dev)
> > > > struct eth_device *edev = dev->attached_dev;
> > > > int ret;
> > > > int oldspeed = dev->speed, oldduplex = dev->duplex;
> > > > + int old_link = dev->link;
> > > >
> > > > ret = drv->read_status(dev);
> > > > if (ret)
> > > > return ret;
> > > >
> > > > + if (dev->link && !old_link) {
> > > > + ret = phy_wait_aneg_read_status(dev, drv);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > This does not help. dev->link is false after reset, so we never get into
> > > phy_wait_aneg_read_status() which waits for a link.
> > read_status update the dev->link as we call update_link
> >
> > if !dev->link means no cable detected
>
> How should the phy detect the cable if we do not wait for it being
> detected?
we do not have too
I'm going to try on the loco
Best Regards,
J.
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
