On 7 November 2012 00:50, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On 22:31 Mon 05 Nov , Robert Jarzmik wrote: >>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> And how do you choose the alternative UART ? loady is not provided such a >>> parameter in its new form. >> by it's name cs1 as example > >>> Now if you want, I can add it. And if I add it, I'll add a timeout also to the >>> xy_flush() function ... >> yes please > >>> >> > can you put the v3 on a tree somewhere so I can pull it >>> >> I'll try. I have no external git I can push to. If you have a hint ... >>> > https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitHosting >>> Ah yes, ok. I'll send you the URL once I've amended the patches, along the >>> patch mails. >> personnaly for at91 we use github tks > Here is my candidate for v3 : > git fetch git@xxxxxxxxxx:rjarzmik/barebox.git xymodem > > If you could test the "loady -t cs1", as I don't happen to have multiple > consoles ... > And Antony, if you have a little bit of time, would you test it also, as that > endianess bug drove me mad. I just have tested your v3 patchset. It works fine on my little-endian MIPS CPU, but it needs a small patch for correct work on the big-endian one. You can find the patch in my next message. I have fetched your v3 branch from your github repo. I'm sorry, but I have no time to test it just now on my hardware. But I think where will be no problems with squashing my patch into it. -- Best regards, Antony Pavlov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
