On 11:44 Wed 10 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The check is wrong since it would have to check whether the
> new iomem region overlaps with an existing region. Checking
> for the base address only is not enough.
> Currently this is not possible because every device conflicts
> with the top iomem region which covers the whole address space.
>
> This at least fixes the regression that devices whose memory region
> begins at 0x0 can no longer be succesfully registered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/base/platform.c | 12 ------------
> 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 13b4620..ea4e37b 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -66,18 +66,6 @@ int platform_device_register(struct device_d *new_device)
> {
> new_device->bus = &platform_bus;
>
> - if (new_device->resource) {
> - struct device_d *dev;
> -
> - bus_for_each_device(new_device->bus, dev) {
> - if (!dev->resource)
> - continue;
> - if (dev->resource->start == new_device->resource->start) {
> - return -EBUSY;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> -
IIRC this break the dt probe no?
this break the arm and st hw atleast
Best Regards,
J.
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
