On 07:40 Sat 08 Sep , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 20:21 Fri 07 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:13:35PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Given that the bootp support seems to have nearly nothing in common > > with the boot/net file wouldn't it be better to just add a new file > > boot/bootp? > why not with the boot sequence we can do so I try to implement it but at the end we duplicate it As we may want to just pass the rootpath via bootp and the reset hardcoded It's better to keep it's support in the same file as the static params are fallback one Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
