On 07/17/2012 02:49 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 13:23 Tue 17 Jul , Christian Kapeller wrote: >> Packing barebox within an uimage gives us integrity checking. >> >> Generate the image with: >> ./scripts/mkimage -A arm -O barebox -T firmware -C none -d barebox.bin -a 0xffffffff barebox.uimage >> >> Signed-off-by: Christian Kapeller <christian.kapeller@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > boot it as a linux kernel > > it will work You are right, it does. But then, I am asking myself, why is there a OS definition for 'barebox', when we aren't using it in the first place? Regards, Christian _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
