Hi Krzysztof, On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:35:10PM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Hałasa <khc@xxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/drivers/nor/cfi_flash.h b/drivers/nor/cfi_flash.h > index df482b6..fec0894 100644 > --- a/drivers/nor/cfi_flash.h > +++ b/drivers/nor/cfi_flash.h > @@ -30,7 +30,17 @@ > #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h> > > typedef unsigned long flash_sect_t; > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_DRIVER_CFI_BANK_WIDTH_8) > typedef u64 cfiword_t; > +#elif defined(CONFIG_DRIVER_CFI_BANK_WIDTH_4) > +typedef u32 cfiword_t; > +#elif defined(CONFIG_DRIVER_CFI_BANK_WIDTH_2) > +typedef u16 cfiword_t; > +#else > +typedef u8 cfiword_t; > +#endif Is this worth it? Do we safe binary size or what else is the reasoning for this patch? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
