Re: IMX_IIM on which SoCs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wolfram,

Le Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:17:10 +0200,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> I just stumbled over commit 97c37f4014b0e3bacf31fe5b6ba890cc7f465838 which
> changes this:
> 
> -       depends on ARCH_IMX25 || ARCH_IMX35
> +       depends on !ARCH_IMX21 && !ARCH_IMX21
> 
> The double !ARCH_IMX21 looks fishy. Can't tell if the second IMX21 should
> have been something else.
> 
excepting i.MX2&, the other IMX supported by barebox have IIM so the
second !ARCH_IMX21 can be removed here

Eric

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux