Hi Baruch ! Sorry, but I didn't catch it. Do you mean that I don't need an OOB description for 218 byte OOB ? Regards, Gabriel On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:03:06AM +0200, Gabriel Tisan wrote: >> Yes, Baruch I meant write support, especially ECC layout for 4K flashes. >> >> Actually the 4k flashes could have 128 or 218 bytes OOB. >> >> Could you point me to some docs about this layout ? I use a flash with >> 218 bytes spare. > > See commit 2c1c5f199 of the Linux kernel at > http://git.kernel.org/linus/2c1c5f199. > > As Eric has pointed out, this may not be necessary for Barebox. > > baruch > >> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Eric Bénard <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Le Sun, 1 Apr 2012 15:52:09 +0300, >> > Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : >> >> Does the Linux kernel detect your flash correctly? >> >> >> > I'm not at this stage for the moment as I'm using a SDcard rootfs to >> > validate the hardware for the moment, but I'm sure the actual problem >> > (in my case at least) in barebox is a detection problem as I get the >> > right values from the flash but these value are ONFI and thus are not >> > right with he actual flash detection code which leads to a wrong >> > configuration of the NFC. Once I hardcode the NFC settings I manage to >> > read/write in the 4k NAND Flash from barebox (environment & kernel >> > are in the flash for the moment). > > -- > http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems > =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= > - baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il - _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
