Hi Derald, On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 06:25:44PM -0500, Derald D. Woods wrote: > All, > > I have an existing design that uses the i.MX21 ARM9 processor. The > design currently uses an external USB OTG chip. The chip is now > end-of-life. I know that this is an older ARM processor. It still meets > most of the design needs. Is the i.MX21 OTG functionality considered > reliable? I have not seen any real success stories with the i.MX21 USB > OTG implementation. Our board currently utilizes the USB OTG chip at > the bootloader and Linux kernel level. > > I would appreciate being pointed in the right direction or warned of > impending danger. > > I posted to this list because the support for i.MX2x processors is still > fairly active in the Barebox community. The i.MX21 is the only i.MX I never used. Maybe you should contact Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@xxxxxxxxx>, he mainlined the i.MX21 USB host driver in Linux. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
