Am 26.07.2011 16:20, schrieb Marc Kleine-Budde: > On 07/26/2011 03:56 PM, Andre Naujoks wrote: >> Hello. >> >> We are currently trying to compile a barebox with the git version of >> ptxdist and the git version of the OSELAS generic Toolchain for powerpc. >> >> Also the current 2011.07.0 release of barebox. >> >> We are having some problems during the build, which I think are a result >> of some changes in gcc's optimizations (since 4.4.something). GCC uses >> some functions on the ppc platform to optimze the size of the resulting >> binary, which are only present in the libgcc.a. >> >> The compile stage works fine up tp the last linker step: >> >> CC arch/ppc/lib/time.o >> AS arch/ppc/lib/misc.o >> CC arch/ppc/lib/ppclinux.o >> CC arch/ppc/lib/board_data.o >> LD arch/ppc/lib/built-in.o >> LD barebox >> common/built-in.o: In function `mapset': >> hush.c:(.text.mapset+0x44): undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x' >> common/built-in.o: In function `syntax_err': >> hush.c:(.text.syntax_err+0x34): undefined reference to `_restgpr_30_x' >> common/built-in.o: In function `done_command': >> hush.c:(.text.done_command+0x94): undefined reference to `_restgpr_29_x' >> common/built-in.o: In function `done_pipe': >> hush.c:(.text.done_pipe+0x5c): undefined reference to `_restgpr_29_x' >> common/built-in.o: In function `is_assignment': >> hush.c:(.text.is_assignment+0x8c): undefined reference to `_restgpr_27_x' >> common/built-in.o: In function `b_addchr': >> hush.c:(.text.b_addchr+0x8c): undefined reference to `_restgpr_28_x' >> common/built-in.o: In function `b_addqchr': >> hush.c:(.text.b_addqchr+0x78): undefined reference to `_restgpr_29_x' >> ... >> >> >> This goes on for a few pages. >> >> As far as I can see, the possibilities I have here, is to either >> integrate the missing functions out of the gcc sources into barebox, or >> make barebox link with libgcc, which seems surprisingly difficult, due >> to the unfamiliar (to me) build process. A simple LDFLAGS_barebox+=-l.. >> -L.. did not help here. >> >> Am I right with this assumption, or am I missing something else here? > > We don't want to link barebox against libgcc, that's bad style. I > suggest to port arch/powerpc/lib/crtsavres.S from the linux kernel to > barebox. Thanks. I will give this a shot and see how far I get. If it works I will come back with a patch. > > cheers, Marc > Regards Andre _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox