On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:12:24AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 22:31 Wed 20 Jul , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:51:04PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > In include/ns16550.h we have: > > > > > > struct NS16550_plat { > > > unsigned int clock; > > > unsigned char f_caps; > > > /** > > > * register read access capability > > > */ > > > unsigned int (*reg_read) (unsigned long base, unsigned char reg_offset); > > > /** > > > * register write access capability > > > */ > > > void (*reg_write) (unsigned int val, unsigned long base, > > > unsigned char reg_offset); > > > }; > > > > > > Why reg_read and reg_write's argument base has type unsigned long? > > > IMHO pointer type (void * or char *) is more natural. > > > > You're right, I also wondered about this recently when looking at a > > patch on the list. I would also rather see void __iomem *. The problem > > is that this driver is also used on X86 which uses inb/outb which take > > an integer argument. > > The Linux driver works around this by having a membase and a iobase > > field along with different register accessors. While being cleaner > > I'm unsure if we want to go this way. > > we can do it via resoure and the flasgs IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT, > IORESOURCE_MEM_168BITi etc.. Yes, but this does not solve the problem with different accessor functions (and their argument type). Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox