>>>>> "Jean-Christophe" == Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Hi, >> + >> + data = xmalloc(d->length); Jean-Christophe> we realloc a buffer here where we alloc one in file_digest Jean-Christophe> and not free it before calling print_digest I'm not exactly sure what you mean, but yes - We could inline print_digest in file_digest and reuse the 4K buf for the digest as well. That would shrink the code slightly (lines / bytes) and get rid of the 2nd xmalloc. I'll fix that and send a v3 shortly. >> + buf = xmalloc(4096); Jean-Christophe> do we really need to allocate the buffer everytime? Not really, but it's simpler to do like this. It's only once per file so hardly a performance issue. >> + while (*argv) { >> + char *filename = "/dev/mem"; >> + ulong start = 0, size = ~0; Jean-Christophe> ulong so so if we want to support 64bit vfs we need to Jean-Christophe> use an other type ulong is what parse_area_spec and the other memory commands use. >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_MD5SUM >> + >> +static int do_md5(struct command *cmdtp, int argc, char *argv[]) >> +{ >> + return do_digest("md5", argc, argv); Jean-Christophe> pass the cmdtp will be good Jean-Christophe> I agree it's not necessary now but I think it's a good Jean-Christophe> practice I think it makes more sense to add it when (if?) it is needed. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox