On 12:25 Tue 31 Aug , Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Hi, > > here's some initial work on getting barebox working on x86 (again?). > > The patch is very ugly, and it makes some assumptions on me using > Darwin/Mac OS X to compile barebox. > What kind of becomes clear though, is that there is no clear distinction > between which set of headers are used for the user space utilities and > which set of headers are used for the barebox binary. I think that's the > reason why barebox features an include/linux directory which seems to > duplicate about half of what Linux usually has in there, but more than > barebox uses (or should use, ftm). > > With the attached patch I get as far as the linking stage. why do you touch it? barebox is self content so I do not understand why you do such modificaton specially uf we are supposed to do crosscompile Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
