On 14:54 Sun 22 Aug , Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > [Sorry, old thread - Been away on vacation] > > >> Which bring up another question. We have plenty of projects out there > >> that rely on kconfig. > > Robert> ptxdist as well. > > And Buildroot and OpenWrt and crosstool-ng, ... > > >> What can we do to kconfig to make the integration easier? > >> > >> We have discussed that kconfig should be a seperate installable tool > >> (as rpm, deb whatever). But there is a few quirks needed before we can > >> do so. > > Robert> I don't think that it is necessary. Last time I checked the most > Robert> complicated thing was to exchange the project name ("Linux kernel") to > Robert> something else, because there were quite a lot of hand coded numbers > Robert> representing the string length or length-1. But we are not up to the > Robert> latest versions - I'll have to re-check. > > Yeah. Buildroot has historically done s/CONFIG_/BR2_/ as well, but I'm > strongly considering going back to CONFIG_. I agree too Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox