On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:19:17PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:10:30PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:04:59PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > > > __LITTLE_ENDIAN or __BIG_ENDIAN are not always defined. E.g. the CodeSourcery > > > G++ Lite 2010q1 for ARM (4.4.1) does not define __BIG_ENDIAN. This causes a > > > compile time warning. > > > > Maybe we should rather define __LITTLE_ENDIAN and __BIG_ENDIAN > > in include/linux/byteorder.h. > > You mean include/linux/byteorder/generic.h? I now see that __LITTLE_ENDIAN and > __BIG_ENDIAN are defined in include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h and > include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h respectively. Should we add their > complement? Yes. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
