[PATCH 14/17] i.MX: remove __REG from esd controller regs. use readl/writel instead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So far these registers are unused in C, so we can remove the __REG without
harm.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/esdctl.h |   10 +++++-----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/esdctl.h b/arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/esdctl.h
index 7f3c66f..d15f52b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/esdctl.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/esdctl.h
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 
 /* SDRAM Controller registers */
-#define ESDCTL0 __REG(IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x00) /* Enhanced SDRAM Control Register 0       */
-#define ESDCFG0 __REG(IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x04) /* Enhanced SDRAM Configuration Register 0 */
-#define ESDCTL1 __REG(IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x08) /* Enhanced SDRAM Control Register 1       */
-#define ESDCFG1 __REG(IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x0C) /* Enhanced SDRAM Configuration Register 1 */
-#define ESDMISC __REG(IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x10) /* Enhanced SDRAM Miscellanious Register   */
+#define ESDCTL0 (IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x00) /* Enhanced SDRAM Control Register 0       */
+#define ESDCFG0 (IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x04) /* Enhanced SDRAM Configuration Register 0 */
+#define ESDCTL1 (IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x08) /* Enhanced SDRAM Control Register 1       */
+#define ESDCFG1 (IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x0C) /* Enhanced SDRAM Configuration Register 1 */
+#define ESDMISC (IMX_ESD_BASE + 0x10) /* Enhanced SDRAM Miscellanious Register   */
 
 #define ESDCTL0_SDE				(1 << 31)
 #define ESDCTL0_SMODE_NORMAL			(0 << 28)
-- 
1.7.0


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux