On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:17:32AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hey Sascha, > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:10:01PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:28:12AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > As a side effect don't build barebox.S when barebox.bin is updated. I > > > didn't manage to keep the old behaviour and I consider it cleaner this > > > way. > > > > I don't understand this completely. We only need barebox.S updated when > > barebox is updated, not when barebox.bin is updated. Is this what you > > mean? > The status quo in your master branch is that barebox.S is > created/updated in the barebox.bin target. After my patch it's a > seperate target depending on barebox. That's fine. Applied to -next. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
