>>>>> "Robert" == Robert P J Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Hi, >> I could see basic I2C access being useful for debugging (of >> non-eeprom devices). Robert> i was imagining the same thing, but since there's no such Robert> support at the moment, there's little value in leaving that Robert> config variable there. Agreed. Robert> personally, i'd rather that didn't happen, just because it's Robert> easier to track paches if they're logically complete and Robert> coherent. in short, when the time comes to add an "i2c" Robert> command, we can put everything back in in one patch. sound Robert> reasonable? Sure. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
