On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:25:41PM -0700, tyson.w.smith@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Tyson Smith <tyson.w.smith@xxxxxxxxx> > > randbits() acts very much like rand() & rand() and does not > provide much value in this context. This function would likely > be more useful in a random bit mask scenario. Where are we doing rand() & rand() ? The changelog implies we're doing this elsewhere, and that this is duplication, but I'm not seeing it. Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
