On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:41:17PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:01:23PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> >
> > > @@ -237,6 +238,7 @@ enum perf_event_read_format {
> > > #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER2 80 /* add: branch_sample_type */
> > > #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER3 96 /* add: sample_regs_user */
> > > /* add: sample_stack_user */
> > > +#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER4 104 /* add: sample_regs_intr */
> >
> > I've not given this a lot of thought before, but I'm assuming these
> > are the 64-bit struct sizes. It might be interesting to also
> > throw some 32-bit sizes in the mix. Who knows what horrors
> > lie in wait for the compat syscalls.
>
> I might be misunderstanding, but I think the attr structure is defined in
> a way that it has the same size on 32 and 64 bit.
ah, ok. Yeah, now that I look at the struct definition, it's all
u32/u64's, so this is the same size on both archs.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
