On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:32:53PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:26:45PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > It seems to me that when the second time alloc_workqueue() is called > > > from the same code path, it would have two locks with the same key, but > > > not the same &wq->name, which doesn't meet lockdep's assumption. > > > > Dang... I reverted the previous patch for now. Peter, does this > > approach sound good to you? > > Whatever works I suppose; like Li said; a little ugly but not sure we > can do better. Cool, Li, can you please spin it on top of v3.14-rc1 w/ SOB and description. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
