Ok, lets me just make some tests on that. But what about synching multiple children processes? And what do you make of a binary log, that allows to do that. Ildar On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:48:40PM -0700, Ildar Muslukhov wrote: > > > Although, the way it is implemented right now is a bit risky, since > > the rand functions are called in place, and we cannot guarantee that > > no other code (like gcc libraries) hasn't made a call to rand() > > function, thus moving the rand queue forward. > > This whole idea seems to hang on this statement, and it bothers me. > > Can this even happen ? I'm not sure it can. > And even if it can, surely it's going to happen again when we re-run > with the same seed, so we don't need to compensate for it. > > Before going too far down this rabbit hole, I want to be sure we're not > over-engineering for a problem that actually isn't. > > Dave > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
