* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > I'm unhappy you guys uses offensive word so much. Please cool down all > you guys. :-/ In fact, _BOTH_ the behavior before and after Cristoph's > patch doesn't have cleaner semantics. Erm, this feature _regressed_ after the patch. All other concerns are secondary. What's so difficult to understand about that? > And PeterZ proposed make new cleaner one rather than revert. No need to > hassle. Sorry, that's not how we deal with regressions upstream... I've been pretty polite in fact, compared to say Linus - someone should put a politically correct summary of: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/22/456 https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/1113 into Documentation/, people keep forgetting about it. I'm sorry if being direct and to the point offends you [no, not really], this discussion got _way_ off the real track it should be on: that this is a _regression_. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
