[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:25:36PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
 > trinity forgot the name of syscall 11 (while running within a UML instance)
 > 
 > ...
 > [watchdog] 21055 iterations. [F:16827 S:4223]
 > [watchdog] pid 2481 hasn't made progress in 30 seconds! (last:1366229784 now:1366229814 diff:30). Stuck in syscall 267:clock_nanosleep. Sending SIGKILL.
 > [watchdog] pid 2500 hasn't made progress in 30 seconds! (last:1366229804 now:1366229834 diff:30). Stuck in syscall 267:clock_nanosleep. Sending SIGKILL.
 > [watchdog] pid 2519 hasn't made progress in 30 seconds! (last:1366229816 now:1366229846 diff:30). Stuck in syscall 11:. Sending SIGKILL.
 > [watchdog] pid 2522 hasn't made progress in 30 seconds! (last:1366229818 now:1366229848 diff:30). Stuck in syscall 11:. Sending SIGKILL.

Stuck in execve. Don't know why it couldn't print out the name,
but I knew about the problem of children not coming back from execve.
I guess I should do that syscall in a child of the child.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux