Re: Partitioning advice sought

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



said Felix Miata via tde-users:

| It's not UEFI that requires it. It's too big for the old partition table
| scheme developed last century. The new scheme is called GPT, for GUID
| Partition Table.

Thanks for this. There were a lot of acronyms that erupted during the 
period between the last two drive installs here. And the last drive 
install was probably five years ago. It being nontrivial and seldom done, 
I committed none of it to memory.

| Most Linux installers, including that of Debian, are capable of doing
| all partitioning required, usually proposing a scheme suitable for use
| with the disk space provided, but allowing alterations to that scheme,
| or letting you create your own. They will also allow you do simply
| specify which partitions you may have already created in advance to use
| for what purpose.

My chief concern was the FAT32 partition. Looking at my current drive with 
gparted, I see the attached, and the placement of the partitions puzzled 
me. But this was during an experiment to boot from a small SSD in pursuit 
of speed. (Which worked briefly but then didn't; the SSD was SDC.) I'm now 
interested not so much in having a drag racer as a reliable car to get to 
town and back. The partitions in the screenshot are not in any order in 
which I would normally place them, which added to my confusion.

| Desire may include a partition for swap, and one or more for user data,
| such as one for mounting to /home/, which is where each user account is
| situated.

Right; got that. Will make a swapfile simply because it is good practice, 
like putting TDE in /opt, which hasn't really been essential since the 
days when I was recompiling KDE a couple times a week, and when things 
went south it was easier to deal with if it was kept in a cage. Now it is 
probably habit, but also one less variable if things went pear-shaped.


| What would be "the usual things"? Order on GPT doesn't matter, but the
| convention is ESP first, then everything else.

The usual things are as shown in the screenshot; you mentioned that ESP 
should come first, but as you can see, it somehow ended up as sda4, and I 
was not sure if this was bookkeeping or the physical location on the 
drive.

I think you've told me what I need, and I thank you.
-- 
dep

Pictures: http://www.ipernity.com/doc/depscribe/album
Column: https://ofb.biz/author/dep/

Attachment: gparted-090324.jpg
Description: JPEG image

____________________________________________________
tde-users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web mail archive available at https://mail.trinitydesktop.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Trinity Devel]     [KDE]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]     [Trinity Desktop Environment]

  Powered by Linux