On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:39:58 +0200 Thierry de Coulon <tcoulon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 07 June 2022 15.24:45 James Leone wrote: > Actually, reading the article I did not even find out what Trinity > was missing (except that "modern look"). I was able to ferret out a few semi-specific complaints: 1. They couldn't find a UI for either system services or turning off autostart bits of TDE (it's not entirely clear which they meant, or even whether they do—or should—understand the distinction). 2. They couldn't figure out how to adjust the font size for desktop icon captions (perhaps it needs a better label than just "Desktop"?) 3. They had unclear issues with the system tray, perhaps because it was overpopulated. 4. The selection of *non*-TDE applications on whatever installer or live media they used didn't match their preferences. 5. They dislike the application-names-start-with-K thing we inherited from KDE. 1-3 are possibly actual problems, but the level of detail mostly isn't good enough to follow up on. E. Liddell ____________________________________________________ tde-users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Web mail archive available at https://mail.trinitydesktop.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
