Gene Heskett wrote: > Well, since this is kmail 1.9, mostly written in 32 bit days, and moving > about half of the debian list to an out of kmail directory, the problem > has not re-surfaced, so I am more than ever convinced its triggered by a > 32 bit overflow someplace. > > Where, I've no clue, but I suspect a concerted effort to bring it into > the 64 bit world would pay stability dividends over the next several > years. Might be - who knows - I looked over it - to understand, one needs the design document or some time to understand how kmail is working. As it is not a simple application the time needed is also not an hour or two. However when you look at the properties of one directory - there is the option to enable/disable indexing. Have you seen this? If your archive is not changing I guess also indexing is not needed there, but not sure. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting