Anno domini 2019 Sat, 19 Oct 15:09:14 +0200 deloptes scripsit: > Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: > > > systemd has nothing to do with "modern" or "better", it's just redhat > > controlling the market. More SLOC than the linux kernel but just a hand > > full of developers does not sound like a sane plan - well, if your > > business model rests on it, it is a sane plan, as a customer I'd run as > > fast as I could. > > No it is not correct and it has been discussed many many times. IF you read > the history, you would also understand why the decision to develop systemd > was taken. > My tests show that it behaves good on buster, so my plan is to use it on the > desktop and notebook - for the server it is not relevant. > I was also sceptic in the beginning and needed some time to understand the > background and also the background of the conflicting opinions. > > The point is, how I understood it, if you have many subsystems that you want > to interact with each other, you need a kind of manager. Obviously the init > and xinitd are not meeting expectations. > > For me it is important to have alternative and debian provides such. No > reason to be paranoid about RH. Also I have not seen issues on the RHEL > servers, I am working with, that could point to systemd. > > I think the main problem is the decision taken by the major distros to > impose it to the user, without alternative and as usual in too early stage, > when the problems were massive. Today - I don't know my impression is > neutral to positive. > > regards > Hi! I'm quite aware of the history and why it has taken this path. And you mind if I object your tests, as mine showed systemd to be quite a PITA. It did not deliver a single point for what it was sold as the only salvation, just on the contrary. Today there's a shism introduced by systemd between "desktop" "server" and "embedded" that make things interestion on linux. Nik > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ > Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting > > -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
