On Thursday 04 April 2019 19:03:46 deloptes wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > No clue, I built it for the rock64, on the rock64, useing the > > patches from the linux-rt mailing list links, but when I asked how > > to install it, 3 times over about as many weeks, and got ignored, I > > gave up. Their propaganda says good support, but AFAIWC, there isn't > > any. But the pi is only very marginally better. Bulding an rt > > kernel on the pi is a several hour project, on the rock64 its about > > 30 minutes, which amply demo's the difference in speeds. Too bad I > > cannot use it. Neither has any docs available to aid the hacker. > > Those are proprietary designs. Run the linux they supply, or go > > pound sand. > > Which one the rock64 or the PI ... I got already confused. Both. I wanted a comparison of build times, both done on the same usb2 interfaced SSD. I built it 4.something at the time, on the rock64, for arm64 then did a make clean, took the drive to the pi and changed the architecture to armhf, and built it on the pi. > For the PI there are very good descriptions of the boot process and > what you need to have on the SD card ... I need to find the links I > used. Also not necessary to build directly on the PI, but you can > cross compile .... well might be easier for you to build directly on > the PI. > > regards > Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
