Am Dienstag, 21. August 2018 schrieb Slávek Banko: > Dne út 21. srpna 2018 Nick Koretsky napsal(a): > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:08:55 -0400 > > > > Gene Heskett <gheskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 21 August 2018 08:21:12 Nick Koretsky wrote: > > > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:55:28 +0200 > > > > > > > > "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" <office@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Am Dienstag, 21. August 2018 schrieb Nick Koretsky: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:20:43 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" <office@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Its tears so far Nik. There are so many differences just in > > > > > > > > the ext4's used that one of them should be renamed, they > > > > > > > > will NOT cross mount, ext4 disk to ext4 mount. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Gene! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you cannot mount the ext4 partions from one another, > > > > > > > then there is something very wrong. ext4 can be mounted as > > > > > > > ext2 and that should alway work - at least, if the drives and > > > > > > > filesystems are ok. > > > > > > > > > > > > No, you are wrong. There were options added to ext4 which made > > > > > > it incompatible with older kernels. And a few years ago they > > > > > > made this options default. Debian wheezy kernel (3.2) would not > > > > > > mount ext4 created in debian stretch. > > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > Now that's a gotcha I did not know. How did it come that this was > > > > > thought of beeing a good idea? > > > > > > > > > > Nik > > > > > > > > Yep. Exactly my thought when i spent 3-hours with a server refusing > > > > to boot after migration to a new hdd (i used a stretch flash to > > > > copy). Who the fuck toughs it was a good idea?!! Why not call it > > > > ext5 or ext4a or whatever?!! > > > > > > +100 > > > > > > Now the question of the day is how the hell do we fix it? > > > > If you need a shared partition between wheezy and stretch create it in > > wheezy. > > I recommend upgrading to wheezy-backports kernel. > > Cheers Maybe I missed the point somewhere, but I was under the impression that Gene wants to run linuxcnc on a production machine, and that needs a realtime kernel. To be more prcise, linuxcnc 2.7 needs a rtai patched kernel if you want decent latentcy, not the rtpreempt kernels from debian. I have now two mills running on devuan ascii, both with the old kernels from linuxcnc-wheezy 'cause of latency. Nik -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
