Re: LTS has less security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 20 June 2018, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Wed June 20 2018 13:13:16 Kate Draven wrote:
> > LTS has less security support in what way. In general because there are
> > less improvements compared to the none lts?
>
> Hi Kate,
>
> A few packages lose all support with LTS.  The majority in my experience
> tend to get somewhat less security support than Stable and OldStable.
>
> OTOH I've seen several cases where a DLA arrived before the equivalent
> DSA.
>
> --Mike
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
So what would your recommendation be. I tend to avoid LTS kernels because I'd 
rather chance it with newer STS kernels.

Thanks for letting me pick your brainZZZZ!

Zombie Kate

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting




[Index of Archives]     [Trinity Devel]     [KDE]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]     [Trinity Desktop Environment]

  Powered by Linux