On Monday 30 April 2018 13:17:43 Curt Howland wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Gene Heskett <gheskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Monday 30 April 2018 11:27:58 Stefan Krusche wrote: > >> You need to import the sender's public key. > > > > Is that buried in the kmail gpg menu's someplace? or a function of kgpg? > > kgpg reads your keyrings, so you can use kgpg to import the key, or > gpg directly. > > However, Kmail does not like sending to or verifying with _untrusted_ keys. > > There is a "list untrusted keys" setting, but it's more reliable to > trust those people's keys you get signed email from. > > One reason, maybe the primary reason, I use TDE is Kmail with mbox > files which I can save, and search, with standard text tools, as well > as easy gpg integration. > > Reading this thread, I, too, have been frustrated by the general lack > of anyone caring about encrypting their email. I'm using the Gmail web > interface right now, there used to be a Firefox plug-in which > encrypted/signed Gmail, but the developer simply could not keep up > with how often Google "updated" (read: changed) the interface and > broke his plug-in. > > Curt- Yeah, they read that Gmail is encrypted, or that this service now uses TLS as well as SSL, or that they offer this or that security feature, or promise more privacy; and then they think there is nothing more to do. Everybody talks about encryption, but not many actually use it. And you can see why here: because encrypting all alone is like having sex all alone. Unless you do it together with others, it's just wanking. Bill Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
