William Morder wrote: > So far it's the best option for private, secure email. You'll have to do > some reading about it (and compare with other email services) to know why. > Either you want end-to-end encryption, and other privacy/security > features, or you don't (yet) care that much. > > My only other option seems to be to roll my own (that is, host my own > email server on my own machine). I know of several people who do that > (such as Richard Stallman, if I recall), but it's a pain in the behind, > and a lot of work just to host your own email accounts with your own > domain, etc. > > I will try to make some enquiries about what is involved, if anybody else > really wants to know. So far, I've just been doing a lot of reading, and > it seems a little too much trouble. In lieu of that kind of hassle, then, > there is ProtonMail. You are welcome to use the hosting service of a friend or so. If you don't have such, we have one here, just let me know. I pay for 5 domains 140/y. What I do not understand in the whole picture is how you get "encryption end to end" - it means the other end must also be encrypted. So what is the difference between this ProtonMail and using normal GnuPG. regards --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
