> On 1 Nov 2017, at 11:49, Thierry de Coulon <tcoulon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Contrary to Nik's 2¢ I would say Q4OS *is* worth bothering, especialy if you > want to introduce new users to both Debian and TDE. > > I got a colleague to install it (1.8) on a netbook - he came to Linux after > KDE 3 and did not know TDE at all. > > *And* I would add that they do an ARM version (I think not yet based on Debian > 9) that runs TDE on the Raspberry pi and similar machines (where KDE and > Gnome 3 have no chance at all). > > I have a Raspberry pi running TDE in my shade, running a TCL front end to a > USB thermometer, that I can check over wifi with Kdrc, lot fo fun :) > > Thierry > I don't particularly like the Q4OS focus on being a Windows replacement (I also do not have any particular issues with Windows - use what works best in the particular use scenario) . I feel a distro should be confident enough in its own right and do things it's own way . Having said that it is clear Q4OS have been successful in attracting attention in the technical press - being truthful I did not know of TDE until I came across it in Q4OS. Also if the Q4OS devs are submitting bug reports etc back to TDE devs then that is a good thing and to be welcomed - maybe even they might be prepared to help out with TDE development ? Padraig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
