On Sunday 28 of August 2016 01:17:45 Gene Heskett wrote: > dd-wrt may have additional bells and whistles. It seems to need a $70 > router to have the resources to do port forwarding, customized iptables > rules and such. However, it has worked so well for me that I have not > had the urge to try some of the $30 routers. Competition generally > leads to a better, cheaper product. > > The new user would be wise to survey what is available, and for how > much. But first learn the lingo well enough to determine if you need > feature such and such. dd-wrt is the only one I trust to not have a > back door in it. Someone else will have to attest for openwrt, and > tomato as I have exactly zero experience with them. I've also previously used the dd-wrt, but after I get to know better OpenWRT, it became my first choice. Part of flash is available as a regular filesystem. Is there a proper packaging system. In short, much more versatile than dd-wrt. Anyway, when I last looked at the dd-wrt pages, so it seemed to me that the development already stagnant for some time. -- Slávek --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
